Configure the evaluation framework according to the type of results, and independently form evaluation conclusions based on professional adaptation and procedures.
The results review is for works, articles, practice records, exhibition materials and digital achievements that have relatively complete content. When accepting, first check the title, responsible entity, content description, process materials, citations and public permission to ensure that the review object is clear and consistent with the submitted version.
Cultural archives and special articles focus on checking data sources and discourse boundaries; artistic works and curation focus on media use, professional completion, and display context; physical education and practice focus on object adaptation, process recording, and ethical requirements; exhibitions and digital communication simultaneously check public value, accessibility, and integrity of rights.
Evaluators form opinions based on their professional scope. When cooperation, teachers and students, project participation or other relationships that may affect judgment are involved, declaration of interests and necessary avoidance must be completed first; when obvious differences arise, a cross-review will be organized.
The comprehensive conclusion states the main basis, necessary modifications, scope of application and public suggestions. Supplementary materials, revised versions and review results are included in the same achievement record, so that the final display content remains consistent with the review opinions.
The association will check the main evidence and key points of professional judgment based on the media form, formation process and public responsibility of the results.
If the results meet the quality, rights and disclosure requirements of the corresponding type, they can be released or archived according to the confirmed version.
List the modifications that must be completed, the confirmation method, and the person responsible for the final version.
Suspend the judgment due to insufficient evidence, process or rights documents, and explain the scope of supplementation and the conditions for re-acceptance.
Explain the main basis, applicable rules and handleable procedures or fact review boundaries.
