The admission process starts with professional recommendations and supports independent review with complete files
Recommendations can be made by current members, institutional members, the candidate's unit or institutions with ongoing professional ties; the association can also initiate targeted invitations to specific individuals or institutions based on professional work needs. The recommendation or invitation basis should explain the time and actual scenario when the professional relationship was formed, list one or two representative practices that can be verified, clarify the role, work quality, continuity and public responsibility of the candidate, and explain its compatibility with the association's purpose and member responsibilities.
Candidate individuals or organizations submit corresponding files after being informed of the recommendation or targeted invitation and agreeing to enter the process. Personal materials focus on describing professional experience, works or project records, and public responsibilities; institutional materials focus on describing subject qualifications, business scope, professional connections, designated liaison roles, and cooperation boundaries.
The association completed material verification, professional adaptation judgment and governance review respectively. Participants who have direct cooperation, relatives, interests or other relationships that may affect independent judgment should declare and avoid forming relevant opinions.
Professional recommendations or targeted invitations are the basis for initiating deliberation and are not equivalent to automatic admission. The association can provide additional facts to the recommending subject or candidate based on the materials, and ultimately confirm whether to issue a formal invitation and the corresponding membership category based on the independent review results.