Expert committee positions
Including the director, deputy director, secretary-general and members, they are responsible for committee leadership, professional coordination, topic review and system research.
Expert Appointment
Expert recommendation, professional review, formal appointment and duty performance management
Expert appointment is based on professional ability, independent judgment and actual performance of duties.
HCSA Sports and Art Development Association selects experts based on the actual needs of expert committee construction, professional research, project consultation and review work, using a combination of organizational recommendation and directional invitation. The recommendation body should explain the candidate's professional direction, representative practice, recommendation basis, and proposed association responsibilities.
The appointment review comprehensively examines the candidate's continuous work in the fields of culture, sports, art, research and publishing, or professional governance, focusing on confirming their professional judgment ability, professional integrity, independent performance conditions, and time guarantee for participating in the work of the association. After review and approval, the association will clarify the position, term, responsibilities and work requirements in a formal appointment document.
Professional field positions
Including conveners in the fields of cultural inheritance, sports humanities, art practice, research and publishing, etc., responsible for professional topics and expert collaboration.
Special review duties
Appointment based on specific matters such as honour selection, project research, achievement review, exhibition projects, etc., and responsible for independent professional evaluation.
Professional consulting and review duties
Provide professional consultation, quality review and program review for key projects, research methods, public communication and program governance.
Expert recruitment process
From the presentation of professional needs to formal appointment and duty performance arrangements, each link completes recommendation, verification, evaluation, review and confirmation of responsibilities.
- 01
Demand presentation and candidate recommendation
The expert committee or the relevant working organization of the association puts forward employment requirements based on annual work, professional construction and special tasks, and recommends candidates who meet the professional direction.
Key points to confirm: purpose of appointment, professional field, proposed position and recommendation basis - 02
Document submission and qualification verification
Candidates submit professional experience, representative achievements, association work ideas and necessary statements, and the association verifies the source of materials, personal role and correspondence between achievements.
Key points to confirm: professional experience, representative achievements, actual contributions and authenticity of materials - 03
Professional ability evaluation
Experts in relevant fields will conduct a comprehensive evaluation on the candidate's professional level, methodological ability, industry experience and suitability for the proposed position.
Key points to confirm: professional depth, judgment ability, field adaptation and collaboration ability - 04
Professional Integrity and Relationship Review
Review the candidate's professional record, interest relationships, confidentiality responsibilities and avoidance conditions to confirm that he or she can independently and impartially undertake the work of the association.
Key points to confirm: professional integrity, declaration of interests, avoidance arrangements and sense of responsibility - 05
Appointment review and decision
The association will review the proposed positions, scope of responsibilities, term arrangements and work requirements in accordance with the governance procedures, formulate an appointment decision and issue appointment documents.
Key points to confirm: job title, responsibilities and authorities, term of office and main work results - 06
Document creation and performance arrangements
Complete expert file registration, arrange committee meetings, professional topics or special tasks, and continue to record duty performance according to job requirements.
Key points to confirm: work plan, task allocation, duty performance records and annual review arrangements
Appointment Category, Term and Duty Performance Requirements
The appointment document clearly clarifies the expert's duties, professional scope, term arrangement and work results in the association, and annual evaluation is based on the actual performance of duties.
| Appointment Category | Main responsibilities | Term arrangement | Main work results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expert committee leadership positions | Coordinate the work of the committee, preside over the review of issues, coordinate expert resources and promote the implementation of important professional opinions | The term of office is determined according to the association’s appointment documents, and performance evaluation is conducted based on annual work. | Annual work plan, meeting resolutions, review opinions on major issues and annual performance report |
| Expert committee member and field convener | Participate in professional direction research, system demonstration, review of major issues and collaboration with experts in the field | Appointed according to the work cycle of the committee, reviewed based on professional participation and work results | Independent professional opinions, topic suggestions, field work plans and professional research results |
| Special review expert | Complete independent review, collective review and necessary re-evaluation within the scope of materials and evaluation standards for specific matters | Appointed based on individual tasks and complete corresponding responsibilities based on review matters | Scoring records, written review opinions, re-evaluation opinions and professional revision suggestions |
| Professional consultants and process review experts | Provide consultation and review on project methodology, implementation quality, professional communication or review process | Determine based on the project cycle or special authorization, and evaluate based on stage results | Consulting opinions, project demonstration reports, procedural review opinions and case closing suggestions |
Annual performance of duties
Record meeting participation, professional opinions, project consultation, review work and completion of related results according to job responsibilities.
Re-appointment and adjustment
Considering professional contribution, work quality, independence, sense of responsibility and the needs of the association's work, the renewal of appointment, job adjustment or the end of the term will be considered.
Responsibility for conduct
Recruited experts should continue to comply with confidentiality, copyright, declaration of interest, avoidance and professional communication requirements, and be responsible for the professional opinions they submit.